
So Nick Clegg, the other one and the other one have agreed to a TV gang-bang. Which is either fine or not fine. Either way, seeing as they’re entertainers now, perhaps they could take on board a few of the following suggestions to make it a spectacle worth spectacling.
1) Each of the participants is allowed a maximum of three swear words, to be deployed whenever they wish. This turns the whole thing into a thrilling tactical encounter. Do you deploy the words one at a time? Or do you load them all up into one monstrous insult along the lines of: “You’ve given us the deepest recession since the 1930s, you fucking shitting cunt!”?
2) Before the debate starts, each party leader must choose an envelope from a selection of, say, a dozen. Contained within that envelope will be a word that the participant is thereafter forbidden from using. Some, such as “economy” or “families”, will have a ready synonym; others, like “the”, “it” and “hung parliament”, will present a genuine test of verbal dexterity.
3) The contestants should be kept in locked, sealed chambers and their microphones should only be activated when it is actually their turn to speak. The twist is that they won’t know exactly when this is, because they will be deprived of light and sound and able to perceive nothing about their surroundings. At worst, this will entail all three leaders talking loudly but uncertainly over each other like the homeless people on the Strand. At best, we will be treated to the sound of a slightly wistful Gordon Brown muttering to himself: “This is more like it.”
4) Each guest is allowed to speak for no more than 45 seconds at a time. This will be enforced thus: the microphone shall be firmly attached to a chunk of radioactive material (manganese-57 is particularly suitable for this purpose) that the candidates must hold if they wish to speak. Should they speak any longer, the material will begin to decay, shooting fatal doses of ionising radiation in Messrs Brown, Cameron and Clegg’s bodies. Their call.
5) Each of the leaders should be required to attend one of the debates wearing only their underwear. The twist is that if all three of them appear in their underwear at the same debate, they all get to keep their clothes on and the host has to strip to their underwear. But if the host has anticipated this and is already in their underwear, the studio audience then have to strip to their underwear. However, the three leaders can then agree to reprieve the studio audience so nobody has to strip to their underwear, by choosing one of themselves to re-strip to their underwear, as well as supplying to their chosen charity the sum of one magic crystal. Basically, underwear. More underwear.
6) The victor of the debates should be decided by a combination of audience text vote and studio audience electronic ballot. The winner should, quite simply, win £250,000, a three-album record deal and a slot at the Royal Variety Performance.
Recent Comments